City
of Atlanta Policy Induced Jobs from Clean Energy Programs Study
By
Benjamin Deitchman, Ph.D.
In
Conjunction with the Atlanta Better Buildings Challenge
The purpose of this study, conducted in collaboration
with the City of Atlanta Office of Sustainability, Southface, CentralAtlanta Progress, and InvestAtlanta, is to develop an input-output (I-O) model
with IMPacts for PLANing (IMPLAN) analysis to estimate the employment and labor
income potential of energy efficiency and solar power programs in the City of
Atlanta. This document explains the
methodology of the model and its potential uses to understand the economic
implications of programs underway or under consideration in the City of
Atlanta. It also provides a brief
analysis of how investments in clean energy programs and related shifts in
expenditures might benefit the local economy and opportunities for employment.
Model
Development Methodology
The key data for the calculations are impact coefficients for 2013 in Fulton County developed through
IMPLAN. IMPLAN is an
econometric modeling system developed by applied economists at the University
of Minnesota and the U.S. Forest Service. Currently in
use by more than 500 organizations, IMPLAN models the trade flow relationships
between businesses and between businesses and final consumers (IMPLAN Group LLC
2014).
The IMPLAN data sets used in this study divides the economy into
536 sectors. Prior research (Deitchman 2011; 2012; 2014; 2015; Deitchman,
Brown, & Baer 2011) informed the aggregations and weighting for the bill of
goods to determine the key impact coefficients relevant to energy efficiency,
solar energy, power generation and transmission, and other economic sectors for
the county. The appendix includes the IMPLAN sectoral scheme developed for this
analysis. Figure 1 above shows the
coefficients for Gross County Product per dollar of investment, employment per
million dollars of investment, and labor income per dollar of investment. The coefficients incorporate the direct,
indirect, and induced demand for the region under consideration and employment
coefficients underwent an adjustment to reflect full time equivalency.
Uses
for the Model
Table 1 shows the model for further analysis. The spreadsheet will multiply the energy
efficiency investment and solar energy investment by the relevant coefficients
derived from IMPLAN to determine the impacts on employment, labor income and
gross regional product. For electricity
bill savings there is a deduction from the power generation sector but, on the
assumption that savings are an opportunity for increased investment in other
areas of the economy, an addition from an aggregation of the rest of the
economy. The table is designed for easy
use for any energy efficiency or solar energy deployment effort within the City
of Atlanta.
Table
1: Model for Analysis in Excel
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
1
|
Entry
|
Enter
Values Below
|
||
2
|
Energy
Efficiency Investment in Million Dollars
|
Leave
Blank if Not Included
|
||
3
|
Electricity
Bill Savings in Million Dollars
|
Leave
Blank if Not Included
|
||
4
|
Solar
Energy Investment in Million Dollars
|
Leave
Blank if Not Included
|
||
5
|
Results
|
Results
|
||
6
|
Change
in Full Time Equivalent Job Years in Fulton County
|
B2*C11+B4*C12-B3*C13+B3*C14
|
||
7
|
Change
in Total Labor Income in Fulton County in Million Dollars
|
B2*C11+B4*C12-B3*C13+B3*C14
|
||
8
|
Change
in Gross Regional Product of Fulton County in Million Dollars
|
B2*C11+B4*C12-B3*C13+B3*C14
|
||
9
|
||||
10
|
IMPLAN
Generated Coefficients
|
Gross
County Product
|
Employment
(Full Time Equivalent)
|
Labor
Income
|
11
|
Energy
Efficiency
|
$ 0.95
|
8.95
|
$
0.71
|
12
|
Solar
Energy
|
$ 0.76
|
7.35
|
$
0.59
|
13
|
Power
Generation
|
$ 0.76
|
3.28
|
$
0.37
|
14
|
Other
Sectors (Aggregated)
|
$ 0.98
|
7.91
|
$
0.63
|
Limitations
of the Model
This model is of Fulton County because IMPLAN data is
available by county and not by city. As
most of the City of Atlanta lies within Fulton County and much of the economic
activity in Fulton County is within the Atlanta city limits, it is representative
of the city’s economy. As with any
model, this effort is an estimate of impacts and not a perfect
calculation. Results will depend on the
specific activities of the deployment efforts, achieved successes of the
policies, and internal and exogenous changes to the local economy. The model only accounts for impacts within
the region and does not include spillover benefits or costs. The model, however, incorporates tested and
rigorous economic methods in reaching its results.
Economic
Implications of Clean Energy Policy in Atlanta
Consistent with studies in other regions, the results
of this analysis indicate that Atlanta could see employment benefits from a
shift away from traditional sources of power generation towards energy
efficiency and solar energy programs.
Investment in energy efficiency produces more jobs, total labor income,
and economic growth per unit of investment than solar energy, power generation,
or the rest of other sectors of goods and services within the economy. Energy efficiency is more labor intensive
than other opportunities for investment, particularly in comparison to the
established power sector. It is worth
noting that labor income per job is higher in the solar sectors due to the technical
expertise required in relevant positions.
Overall these results should help to justify energy efficiency and
renewable energy policies and programs based on their economic potential,
particularly cost effective investments that yield significant utility bill
savings over the long term.
Resources
Deitchman, B.
(2011). Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants in Georgia:
Opportunities for Growth through Local Government Energy Savings. Atlanta, GA:
Enterprise Innovation Institute.
Deitchman, B.
(2012). Changing the State of State-Level Energy Programs: Policy
Diffusion, Economic Stimulus and New Federalism Paradigms. World Energy Engineering Congress, November
2012.
Deitchman, B. (2014).
Beyond Recovery- Policy Options for Energy Efficiency Financing. World Energy Engineering Congress October
2014.
Deitchman, B.
(2015). Jobs, Jobs, Jobs: Energy Efficiency and Growth through State and
Local Implementation. Deil Wright
Symposium (American Society for Public Administration), March 2015.
Deitchman, B., Brown, M., & Baer, P. (2011).
Green Jobs from Industrial Energy Efficiency. Energy
Productivity in Industry: Partners and Opportunities, 2011 American Council
for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE) Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry. Washington, DC: ACEEE.
IMPLAN Group LLC.
(2014). IMPLAN System: 2013 IMPLAN County Data for Fulton County –
GA. Huntersville, NC: IMPLAN Group LLC.
Produced
by Benjamin Deitchman, Ph.D. as an independent consultant.
Appendix-
IMPLAN Analysis Bill of Goods
IMPLAN Sector Code
|
Aggregation for Energy Efficiency
|
|
52
|
Construction of new health care
structures
|
|
53
|
Construction of new manufacturing
structures
|
|
54
|
Construction of new power and
communication structures
|
|
55
|
Construction of new educational
and vocational structures
|
|
56
|
Construction of new highways and
streets
|
|
57
|
Construction of new commercial
structures, including farm structures
|
|
58
|
Construction of other new
nonresidential structures
|
|
59
|
Construction of new single-family
residential structures
|
|
60
|
Construction of new multifamily
residential structures
|
|
61
|
Construction of other new
residential structures
|
|
62
|
Maintenance and repair
construction of nonresidential structures
|
|
63
|
Maintenance and repair construction
of residential structures
|
|
64
|
Maintenance and repair
construction of highways, streets, bridges, and tunnels
|
|
275
|
Air purification and ventilation
equipment manufacturing
|
|
276
|
Heating equipment (except warm air
furnaces) manufacturing
|
|
277
|
Air conditioning, refrigeration,
and warm air heating equipment manufacturing
|
|
297
|
Industrial process furnace and
oven manufacturing
|
|
298
|
Fluid power cylinder and actuator
manufacturing
|
|
299
|
Fluid power pump and motor
manufacturing
|
|
325
|
Electric lamp bulb and part
manufacturing
|
|
326
|
Lighting fixture manufacturing
|
|
327
|
Small electrical appliance
manufacturing
|
|
328
|
Household cooking appliance
manufacturing
|
|
329
|
Household refrigerator and home
freezer manufacturing
|
|
330
|
Household laundry equipment
manufacturing
|
|
331
|
Other major household appliance
manufacturing
|
|
387
|
Office supplies (except paper)
manufacturing
|
|
388
|
Sign manufacturing
|
|
389
|
Gasket, packing, and sealing
device manufacturing
|
|
398
|
Retail - Electronics and appliance
stores
|
|
399
|
Retail - Building material and
garden equipment and supplies stores
|
|
463
|
Facilities support services
|
|
IMPLAN Sector Code
|
Aggregation for Power Generation
and Distribution
|
|
41
|
Electric power generation –
Hydroelectric
|
|
42
|
Electric power generation - Fossil
fuel
|
|
43
|
Electric power generation –
Nuclear
|
|
44
|
Electric power generation – Solar
|
|
45
|
Electric power generation – Wind
|
|
46
|
Electric power generation –
Geothermal
|
|
47
|
Electric power generation –
Biomass
|
|
48
|
Electric power generation - All
other
|
|
49
|
Electric power transmission and
distribution
|
|
50
|
Natural gas distribution
|
|
IMPLAN Code(s)
|
Weighted
Sectors for Solar Energy
|
Weight
|
57/58
|
Construction
|
30%
|
247/248
|
Hardware Manufacturing
|
17.5%
|
301/319/332/333
|
Electrical Equipment
|
17.5%
|
283
|
Electronic Components
|
17.5%
|
455/456
|
Scientific and Technical Services
|
17.5%
|
Note:
Any Sectors Not Part of Energy Efficiency or Power Generation are part of the Other
Sectors Aggregation
No comments:
Post a Comment